<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>brip blap - Latest Comments in cnbc smackdown</title><link>http://bripblap.disqus.com/</link><description>money, success and the future of work</description><atom:link href="https://bripblap.disqus.com/cnbc_smackdown/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 16:19:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: cnbc smackdown</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/cnbc-smackdown/#comment-6998537</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That is a crappy network. It's about entertainment (bad one), not about investing OR business.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shadox</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 16:19:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: cnbc smackdown</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/cnbc-smackdown/#comment-6948200</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I saw that the other night, loved it!   Not just that segment but the one following it about how obviously America thinks Obama is failing--forget the polls--just look at the Dow!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's nice watching someone else say what I'm thinking, especially someone that can make me laugh so hard.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Retired Syd</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:46:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: cnbc smackdown</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/cnbc-smackdown/#comment-6947014</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And some have come to business reporters' defense.  I'm also talking about this in my blog.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.investoralist.com/media-extricates-from-financial-crisis-responsibility/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.investoralist.com/media-extricates-from-financial-crisis-responsibility/"&gt;http://www.investoralist.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dana Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:00:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: cnbc smackdown</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/cnbc-smackdown/#comment-6946813</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't see the video at work (sob!) but even without the it-was-scripted stuff, does CNBC really still qualify as journalism?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">guinness416</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:52:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: cnbc smackdown</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/cnbc-smackdown/#comment-6946470</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is flat out awesome.  CNBC is just entertainment for 23.5 hours a day.  The other .5 hours it provides a few tidbits through good interviews or guests.  Of course, Larry Kudlow probably nullifies the limited amount of good information CNBC provides.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chad @ Sentient Moey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:38:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>