<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>brip blap - Latest Comments in crowdsourcing</title><link>http://bripblap.disqus.com/</link><description>life, money and everything in between</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:15:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: crowdsourcing</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/crowdsourcing/#comment-1550619</link><description>You mention Hollywood Stock exchange, but what they're doing at Media Predict is more interesting (&lt;a href="http://www.mediapredict.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.mediapredict.com&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They've gotten media companies to use a market system to actually put out content. So the crowd takes the role of editor, A&amp;amp;R rep, and more. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think market-based investment systems are the way to go for crowdsourcing. Mere voting (like at Digg) isn't a good way to drive decisions -- people have no incentive to give good information.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike Malina</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:15:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: crowdsourcing</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/crowdsourcing/#comment-1550618</link><description>@No Debt Plan:  True, and I guess that's a critical distinction to be made: being contrarian is more about how you use the information that you've gathered, crowdsourced or otherwise, instead of the way in which it's gathered.  If I want to be contrarian about the stock market I'm still going to examine mass population attitudes (the run-up in gold is a good example of something exhibiting "dumb" crowd activity).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve (Brip Blap)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:34:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: crowdsourcing</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/crowdsourcing/#comment-1550617</link><description>The only problem is when the crowd runs off of a cliff (a la sub-prime, Bear Sterns, etc.).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Question: Where does being contrarian fit into this?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">No Debt Plan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:25:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: crowdsourcing</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/crowdsourcing/#comment-1550616</link><description>I think the next big crowdsourcing app is going to be Google's Health page.  It falls right along your notion of looking for another opinion but might also cut down on a lot of leg work + money: something we over at &lt;a href="http://MilkYourMoney.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;MilkYourMoney.com&lt;/a&gt; are tackling daily.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here is Google Blog's announcement:  &lt;a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/google-health-first-look.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/google-h...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:23:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>