<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>brip blap - Latest Comments in net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://bripblap.disqus.com/</link><description>what should I do with my life?</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:26:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-11634039</link><description>net worth is relevant as a continuing benchmark for your own purposes...say every 6 months to a year....though using it to compare yourself to others is rarely useful.  Risk and the extent of your diversification would eventually reveal themselves though either rapidly growing or shrinking net worth as people who were largely or solely invested in their primary residences have found out.  Also, one would assume that assets with positive cash flow would also reveal themselves as that cash flow is used to save, invest or buy other assets...if it is spent on crap then it is irrelevant anyway!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ldk</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:26:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-4581277</link><description>I wrote a post close to this a while back.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just think cash flow is always better than net worth. It is cash flow that will keep you going.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.moneymonk.net/2008/03/net-worth-is-joke-cash-flow-is-better.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.moneymonk.net/2008/03/net-worth-is-j...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Moneymonk</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 20:53:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549186</link><description>I've always struggled with the importance of the net worth number and it's relevance. It's definitely all relative, and think that a different calculation based on your level of financial freedom might be more prudent.  That could take into account your regional differences as well as give you some practical information to use.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It would be less a figure to compare between you and others, and more a figure to compare between you and yourself, which makes it ultimately more valuable to your financial progress.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Know The Ledge</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:45:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549187</link><description>Halleluja Brother! Net Worth don't mean no hill o'beans because you have to guess at the valuations of all of them little ol' businesses and investment real-estate that produce all of that sweet cash. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mah own little ol' net worth just kept climbin' and climbin' as I sold off those little ol' income-producing assets and businesses to big, fat corporations with deep pockets ... suggest y'all do the same using some of the same tricks o'the trade that ah did ... c'mon over, pull up a chair, and sit by the fire and ah'll tell y'all about 'em ...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">7million7years</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:12:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549184</link><description>I think it has value to the individual which you touched on at the end of the article.  It is difficult to understand what it means to other people unless they know the other details that you mentioned.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In my case, I'm pretty open with most of the extra information.  People know what I'm invested in (to some degree), how it's calculated, and where I live.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lazy Man and Money</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:57:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549181</link><description>Thanks, JimB.  That's another avenue I didn't really even get into - that the term "net worth" is being used as a marketing tool to make us feel inadequate.  My net worth isn't as high as Fred's!!  Let's invest in pork belly futures!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Good point!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:18:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549182</link><description>This is a really great post. Too many people use "net worth" to keep score in life and many investment firms use it as a marketing tool. It clearly changes over time depending on which asset classes you are invested in.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JimB</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:22:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549180</link><description>I'm perfectly OK with disagreements with my conclusion.  I think my point was more that it doesn't serve much purpose as a comparative tool, and it depends heavily on factors that aren't included in the calculation as to whether your net worth is "good" or "bad."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:19:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549179</link><description>As interesting as the post is , I'm with moneygardener in respectfully disagreeing with just about everything in the post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The fact that "net worth"may be measured differently by different people and different amounts may have different relative meanings to different individuals does in no way detract from its usefulness as a personal finance tool. For me, net worth calculation is the primary measure of progress towards my retirement goal (although other measures are also relevant).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">traineeinvestor</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 03:06:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549178</link><description>&lt;a href="http://themoneygardener.blogspot.com/2008/01/why-net-worth-is-not-worthless.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Here is my rebuttal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;(Note from Brip Blap:  the URL was too long for the comment format, so I HTMLed it.  Still directs to same post).  &lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">moneygardener</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:11:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549177</link><description>I like it - and agree to a point; but at the same time it has made me very aware of what and where my money is going.  I think it can take a huge tangent when you start to say WHAT is defined in it.  If you keep it simple, I think Flexo might have mentioned it months ago in a post I read, net worth is what you're worth if you had to sell everything you own right this minute.  If you did, how much money would you have?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For me it is more of a bookmark on my financial "novel"...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hank</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:59:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549176</link><description>Great post.... but I disagree with almost every argument you've made.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I will endeavour to post about this on my blog in the next week or so..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">moneygardener</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:58:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549175</link><description>It is true that you can argue forever about what should be included in your net worth or not. However, if you stick to the same calculation years after years, it could be a great help in order to design a financial plan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your net worth progress is an indicator (not the only one) of your financial health. If it's stable or decreasing, then you should take a closer look at your investment portfolio or your budget. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You also have to determine why your net worth is increasing. if the house pricing is  going up in your area or if you made a major capital gain for one year, you might not be doing so well in reality.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here are more thoughts about including your property or not in your net worth :  &lt;a href="http://www.thefinancialblogger.com/why-calculating-your-property-value-in-your-net-worth/" rel="nofollow"&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;(Note from Brip Blap:  the URL was too long for the comment format, so I HTMLed it.  Still directs to same post).  &lt;/em&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Financial Blogger</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:58:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549174</link><description>I don't calculate networth per se, but I do keep separate running tabs of my debt, my retirement, and my savings accounts.  These will give me a good snapshot.  Of course, it depends on which day that snapshot is taken!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Having studied statistics, I find a moving average to be more useful (also a useful tool for weight loss, and google will do that one for you).  It gives me the "true value" amongst all the noise.  It has its limits, though, because it would depend on which statistical model would be used (I like a simple regression).  It also doesn't answer the question of whether to include the house, though it does address the income question.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">deepali</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 23:46:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549173</link><description>I also lived in a false world for a while basking on my net worth. (with house included). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that cash flow generation should be a better metric to focus on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is what we should keep making better. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now I just have to figure out how.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fathersez</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:21:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549172</link><description>Great comments!  I should point out that I don't dismiss net worth's value as a motivational tool.  Weight loss is again a good comparison.  If I tell you I lost 50 pounds, it makes a big difference if I weighed 250 pounds or 600 pounds as to whether it's an impressive loss.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do think net worth is helpful as a motivational tool.  I just think that it's overused as a personal finance tool.  If you work in finance, you realize that equity is only one measure of a company's health.  A million other things indicate growth or stagnation or decline:  cash flow, return on equity, profit and loss, earnings before taxes, etc.  I personally have tried to shift my thinking to "earning power" - what could I generate in cold hard cash from my assets?  That's the true measure of financial freedom.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:08:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549171</link><description>I just think of all the Jane Austen novels when I think of net worth. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Net worth = value on marriage market &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dasha</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:12:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549170</link><description>Too bad "tool" isn't a good google key word . . . :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am going to announce my networth at dinner tonight. I wonder what my 3 year old will think?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rocketc</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:25:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549169</link><description>I LOVE to calculate my networth.  I wouldn't say that it's a valuable tool.  However, calculating my net worth at the end of every month makes me re-evaluate my investment decisions (currently only my retirement accounts and mutual fund).  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree that net worth isn't a great comparison tool (plus, I'd sounds like a total tool if I said that I was worth $20k at dinner) with others.  However, I think it's a great tool at comparing your current situation to your past situation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SavingDiva</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:12:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549168</link><description>This sounds like the conversation hubby and i had about net worth last week. I think it can be motivating on an individual personal level to increase your net worth but when comparisons start flying, it's just not a very useful tool. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great post!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">remodelingthislife</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:16:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549167</link><description>I think net worth is about as useful as equity in evaluating a company. I have had some fun lately in evaluation my finances as if I was a company  e.g. making an equivalent balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement. Rather than net worth (which I also hate, when it is used as a bragging point) I think the pertinent numbers are profit margin (which is the equivalent of savings rate), and free cash flow. For home owners, debt to equity is also important. Overall, I think it comes down to what kind of financial lifestyle one leads. For instance, if I had millions, I wouldn't care about income since I could never spend that amount of money anyway, whereas for early retirement purposes, the profit margin is an important measure of financial independence and the free cash flow says something about post retirement capabilities.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Early Retirement Extreme</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:58:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549166</link><description>Certainly a very interesting and informative post in the least. As I read it I find myself thinking back to one of my fiance's former bosses.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He essentially generated all of his income with his existing bank account. He bought and ran franchises, more or less. He was the kind of guy really concerned about his net worth and how it reflected onto him as a person.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He even went so far as living in a ritzy area, Bedford, NH. But his home paled in comparison to all those around him (200k range, when everone else has 800k+)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the end of things, no matter how much he was actually worth he couldn't come up with the liquid assets to open up any of the big cash cow franchises, like McDonalds, Dunkin' Donuts, et cetera. Every cent he had was tied and hard to cash out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So you certainly make a point, and it's a breath of fresh air to hear someone blogging about net worth like a tool, versus a score in Pacman.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ed</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:23:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549165</link><description>Net worth is never perfect, we can only guessimate</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">moneymonk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:12:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549164</link><description>I think we all know net worth is just a bragging right. It means little in terms of knowledge of money, means to grow and protect your money, etc.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Investor's Journal</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:08:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: net worth or net worthless?</title><link>http://www.bripblap.com/2008/net-worth-or-net-worthless/#comment-1549163</link><description>Stay tuned, Mike. I plan on writing about that for tomorrow's article. ;)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:58:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>